I attend an art’s school, Columbia
College in downtown Chicago. I am a writer, a visual learner, a person who
likes pictures but I hate art. Hate is a strong word. I dislike art very much.
I just cannot get into art like some others can. What is art and what is not
art? If you take away the Picasso’s and other famous artists and sculptor’s
what are you left with? Art from the past one hundred years which is not really
art.
Our class
took three different tours of art museums in Chicago’s south loop. We visited
the Chicago Cultural Center, the Art institute, and Columbia’s Museum of
Contemporary Art. Through all these
tours they have only reinforced my opinion of art. ART IS STUPID. No disrespect
to any artist but certain things that are considered art, you could walk into a
pre-school classroom with a kid who has a Crayola crayon stuck up his nose who
drew the exact same patterns. The little does not know any fancy words or
tricks or patterns. He just drew but what he did is not considered art. It
makes me mad thinking about how so many people have so much better work but are
not recognized because some of the crap that is in Art Museums.
In the Art Institute, specifically in
the European art section like there were thirteen naked pictures me and a couple
classmates counted. They were painted naked and some angel wings were added and
other things. My two year old nephew does better work using the crayons he gets
from red lobster. I just think that outside of some of the historic work that
are in museums that other work is just plain ridiculous. People try to make you
think its art by adding some type of reasoning behind it that does not make
sense. In the same gallery there was a guy projected on four TV screens rubbing
him with black paint. The artist said that the reason he made that was to show “the
mind under stress when it collapses.” I was disappointed when I walked into Columbia’s
art museum.
I know a lot of Columbia’s art work
in their museum is student work but I did not like it one bit. Particularly on
the first floor where they had 60 candid’s made into a collage made up of
random items in a household or business. Quite possibly the dumbest thing I
have ever seen outside of watching a cub’s game. As I continued to walk through
the museum through my hate for art I found something I liked. It was still a
bunch of candid photos all lined up together. The candid were houses and
business and even a factory. What made these so special were they all shared a
common address, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. This was made clear by the artist
Mark Beregan who I think did a great job. Unlike the other artist who took candid’s
of random items and really had no meaning behind it, Beregan did. The top floor
of the museum consisted of five TVs were politicians and others who were about
to go on for an interview practiced making faces. This really got you thinking
that if they practice their face are they telling the truth. I did not think it
was art but it was very informative which I guess makes it art like newspaper
doodles in the Sunday paper.
What is art, what isn’t? Are oil
painting and naked angel babies’ art? Why are a bunch of photos with no purpose
either alone or together art? It makes so f****** sense to me, like at all. The
more I think about it the angrier I get. I see real art every day. Wall Murals,
sculptures, oil paintings of real people, QUALITY CANDIDS. Those are some
examples of real art that I see every day just walking down the street. Those
artist do not need a bulls*** paragraph to convince people why its art, the
artist I see you know its art.
do you hate art, or do you hate things people consider art. i can agree with the fact that alot of the things that we saw in the museum was not art.
ReplyDelete